Over the past few months, I’ve been writing in-depth articles on annihilationism, demonstrating its falsity from a few different angles. I hope to eventually attack the heresy in a systematic manner, perhaps in the form of a book. Until then, stay tuned to http://www.biblicaltrinitarian.com for more articles from me and Mike Burgos.
Below, I’ve organized the anti-annihilationism articles at Biblical Trinitarian for any who are interested in reading more on the subject of annihilationism’s falsity. This Wednesday, I’ll be more of my personal testimony for any interested readers :)
- Hermeneutical Critiques: (a.)The Necessity of Typological Exegesis: Refuting the Annihilationist “Mention-of-Expansion” Rule; (b.) Hell No: The Terrible Hermeneutic of Annihilationism.
- Proof-text Critiques: (a.)Lex Talionis in 2nd Thessalonians 1:9; (b.)Sodom and Gomorrah: A Prefigure and Type.
- Doctrinal Critique: Does the Doctrine of Hell Conflict with Penal Substitutionary Atonement?
For more reading, please check out George Alvarado’s articles over at DefendingContending.com. He is producing a quality series titled “Rethinking Conditionalism” where he does a fantastic job of exposing the linguistic trickery employed by many proponents of annihilationism. Click here to read: Rethinking Conditionalism by George Alvarado.
Soli Deo Gloria